Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of rape conviction, on the grounds that: a failure to record the presence of friends with the complainant at the Garda station, and to obtain statements from them in relation to recent complaint, did not render the trial unfair or unsatisfactory as the defence could have caused the complainant’s friends to be sought out and could have cross-examined her as to what she had said to them.
Appellant convicted of rape – sentence of six years’ imprisonment imposed – backdated sentence – complaint made the evening of the day after the offence – Sexual Assault Treatment Unit – no evidence adduced of recent complaint - complainant gave evidence at trial that she made a complaint to her friends before reporting it to An Garda Siochana – no statements were obtained from these people, who were with her at the station – importance of evidence of these two friends – engagement was unknown to the defence – failure to record the presence of witnesses and to obtain statements – witnesses relevant to consistency and credibility of the complainant – application to quash the conviction – medical evidence of injury – communication by text between the appellant and the complainant – would have been open to the appellant to cause the complainant’s friends to be sought out – could have cross-examined the complainant as to what she said to these people – complainant did not mention to Gardai that she had told those accompanying her about the offence – no reason to suppose she had – debatable as to whether or not they were in breach of their obligations to seek out evidence – departure from their duty – Gardaí ought to have approached the friends with a view to ascertaining any engagement and sought statements – whether failure to do so gave risk to a real risk of an unfair trial – court not satisfied that the absence of information that such person had engaged with the complainant prior to her arrival at the Garda station renders the trial unsatisfactory – appeal dismissed.