Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court rules in favor of allowing the disclosure of its judgments in family law proceedings to the trustee in bankruptcy and the Workplace Relations Commission, to ensure that the in camera nature of Irish family proceedings does not impede justice, the court rejecting the suggestion to delay matters until after the completion of bankruptcy proceedings abroad, emphasizing the need to protect the legitimate interests of the children and their mother, who has been significantly affected by the defendant's financial and corporate conduct.
Family law proceedings - bankruptcy - trustee in bankruptcy - Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) - in camera rule - disclosure of judgments - Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004, s.40(3)(b), s.40(8) - maintenance - children's welfare - legitimate interests - beneficial interest - property - insolvency service - international jurisdiction - common law, JD v. SD [2014] 3 IR 483 - variation of maintenance - corporate wrongdoing - tax wrongdoing - selective compliance - justice impediment - redactions - public interest.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.