Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses the plaintiffs' application for discovery of two remaining categories of discovery which were sought against the ninth defendant (in proceedings where the plaintiff alleges that the defendants are co-conspirators in an alleged scheme which is intended wrongfully to divest the plaintiffs of their shares, or the benefit of their shares, in a company for the benefit of the first defendant), on the grounds that the documents were neither necessary nor relevant to the plaintiffs' claim.
Application by plaintiffs for discovery against ninth defendant - proceedings relate to the plaintiff's claims that the the defendants are co-conspirators in an alleged scheme which is intended wrongfully to divest the plaintiffs of their shares, or the benefit of their shares, in a company for the benefit of the first defendant - documents must be relevant and necessary - agreement reached in relation to certain categories - two categories remained outstanding - documents in disputed categories were neither relevant nor necessary - discovery of disputed categories refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only e-mail alert service for all Irish judgments over the past 13 years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now