Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court, in an action concerning the grant of a mobile phone licence tender in 1996, directs one of the defendants, a businessman, to make discovery of documents provided to him by a tribunal of inquiry, and to make them available for inspection, on the grounds that the public interest in the administration of justice outweighs any alleged confidentiality attached to the documents, which were widely circulated during the Tribunal's public hearings. The original decision to withhold the documents has been set aside, as the court determined that the interests of justice in ensuring a fair trial are paramount. (Judgment amended by order of the court on 20 February 2025)
GSM mobile phone licence, tender process,, Moriarty Tribunal, confidentiality, discovery order, supplemental affidavit, public interest, administration of justice, fair trial, inspection of documents, Tribunal of Inquiry (Evidence) Act 1921, Peruvian Guano relevance, litigious advantage, public sitting books, High Court, businessman, supplemental affidavit of discovery.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.