Court of Appeal affirms the High Court's decision to issue Isaac Wunder orders, restraining a former teacher from instituting further proceedings without court permission and striking out all pending applications before the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) and Labour Court. The teacher's extensive litigation history, involving over fifty applications, complaints, and appeals, was deemed vexatious and an abuse of process. The court found that all issues had been conclusively determined against the appellant, who failed to demonstrate any error of law or unsustainable finding of fact in her numerous appeals. The orders were necessary to protect the respondents and the administration of justice from the appellant's relentless and groundless litigation.
Isaac Wunder orders, Workplace Relations Commission (WRC), Labour Court, Court of Appeal, High Court, vexatious litigation, abuse of process, res judicata, teacher's dismissal, Education and Training Board, Minister for Education, litigation campaign, appeal on point of law, administrative tribunals, constitutional jurisdiction, finality of litigation, inherent jurisdiction, stay of execution, Supreme Court.