Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal affirms the High Court's decision that legislation does not permit the provision of legal aid to corporate entities, on the grounds that the relevant statute's language, structure and context of its provisions clearly indicate an intention to provide civil legal aid exclusively to natural persons; and the applicant's argument based on the Aarhus Convention did not demonstrate that the proceedings were "prohibitively expensive," and thus did not necessitate a different interpretation of the statute.
Civil Legal Aid Act 1995 - corporate entities - natural persons - Interpretation Act 2005 - EU Charter of Fundamental Rights - Aarhus Convention - Court of Appeal - prohibitively expensive - legal aid eligibility - contra legem - High Court - judicial review - environmental advocacy - effective remedy - Article 47(3).
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.