Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court awards 95% of the "party and party" costs to the plaintiffs in respect of an order to restrain the dissipation of proceeds of sale from the family home, and the dismissal of an application to strike out the claim, 5% having been deducted to reflect the failure of the plaintiffs to comply with the provisions of the mediation legislation.
intestate estate, Mediation Act 2017, Legal Services Regulation Act 2015, costs award, interlocutory injunction, Mareva injunction, statutory declaration, mediation, negotiation, compliance, party and party costs, Statement of Claim, Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC), public interest, alternative dispute resolution (ADR), estate dispute, family dispute, conduct of proceedings, statutory obligations.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.