Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court determines that the evidence of a US constitutional law expert was inadmissible in proceedings that only concerned matters of Irish domestic law.
Whether evidence from American constitutional law expert was admissible at trial - whether such evidence was reasonably required to enable the court to determine the proceedings - O.36, r.58(1) of the Rules of the Superior Courts - claim concerning alleged infringement of right of privacy - alleged determination of matters by the Oireachtas - publication of confidential information - entitlements of plaintiff under Irish law - reference to United States jurisprudence - notice of intention to call expert in US law as witness - inadmissibility of expert evidence in relation to matters of Irish domestic law.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now