The High Court has refused a defendant's application to extend the time to appeal a Possession Order, originally made by the County Registrar, due to a significant delay and the absence of a strong defense. The defendant, who is a full-time carer for her disabled husband and represented herself, failed to demonstrate that she had formed an intention to appeal within the required ten-day period following the order. Furthermore, the court found that her challenging domestic situation and status as a litigant in person did not meet the criteria for an extension under the established legal test.
Possession Order, extension of time to appeal, litigant in person, Eire Continental test, Supreme Court, intention to appeal, County Registrar, Deed of Assignment, mortgage default, owner of charge, right to possession, Seniors Money v. Gately, High Court, finality of litigation.