Court of Appeal allows appeal against the severity of sentence of 18 months' imprisonment imposed for issuing 93 false invoices after a wife took over the running of a company from her husband, and suspends the final six months of the sentence, on the grounds that a failure to identify a headline sentence, coupled with other factors not mentioned by the sentencing judge, amounted to an error in principle.
Criminal law – sentencing – appeal against the severity of sentence of 18 months' imprisonment imposed for issuing 93 false invoices – whether the failure to nominate a headline sentence was an error in principle – failure to identify a headline sentence coupled with other factors not mentioned by the sentencing judge amounted to an error in principle – final 6 months of 18 month sentence suspended – appeal allowed.