Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court has refused a family's motion to strike out debt collection proceedings related to unpaid taxes, finding no inexcusable delay by the plaintiff. The defendants, all engaged in tarmac contracting, had sought to dismiss the case citing a lack of progression over four years. However, the court determined that the delay was justified due to parallel proceedings before the Tax Appeals Commission, which must be resolved first. The original proceedings sought to recover amounts due under notices of assessment for various periods between 2004 to 2014. The defendants' tax appeals were initially deemed inadmissible, but this decision was overturned by the Court of Appeal, reopening the question of admissibility without compliance with statutory conditions. The court concluded that the balance of justice did not favor dismissing the proceedings, as the defendants failed to demonstrate any significant prejudice from the delay.
debt collection proceedings, tax appeals, Tax Appeals Commission, notices of assessment, strike out application, inordinate delay, inexcusable delay, balance of justice, parallel proceedings, summary summons, admissibility ruling, judicial review, Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, Finance Act 2012, Finance (Tax Appeals) Act 2015, High Court, Court of Appeal, Primor test, procedural fairness, statutory conditions, tax resident, final and conclusive assessments.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.