Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court denies a father's application seeking orders for compensatory access, therapeutic support, and enforcement measures against the mother, following a breakdown in access to his eldest child, on the grounds that there was no evidence of parental alienation as alleged by the father, and emphasising the importance of respecting the children's expressed wishes, particularly those of the eldest child who has chosen to limit contact.
Compensatory access - parental alienation - therapeutic support - family therapy - Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 - Family Law Act 1995 - high conflict litigation - shared parenting - divorce proceedings - judicial separation - voice of the child report -s.32(1)(b) report -best interests of the child - communication breakdown - non-enforcement of court order - children's expressed wishes - UN Convention on the Rights of the Child - Article 42A of the Constitution - family dynamics - contact disputes.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.