High Court refuses judicial review of the decision to refuse a Cameroonian national refugee status, on the grounds that the manner in which the Refugee Appeals Tribunal made its adverse credibility findings was legally sound and not vitiated by any material error in law.
Judicial review – telescoped hearing – Cameroonian national challenging the decision of the Refugee Appeals Tribunal to refuse him refugee status - father lived in Balangou, where he was a Notable – on the day of her father’s funeral, she was brought to the chief’s house and told that she had to be his wife - she refused and was told that she could not disobey his orders - ordered to drink a glass of human blood - refused to drink because she was a Catholic and drinking human blood would have had an impact on her body – she refused to make love to the chieftain, so he ordered one of his notables to hit her - held for two days without food or water, and she then collapsed - brought to hospital - guarded by one of the chief’s men - states that she asked him to go to the toilet, which was in an outbuilding, and that she escaped from the toilet - walked to the gendarmerie in Bangangte which is approximately 100km away - states that the gendarmerie told her that they could not protect her as they are under the control of the chief - went to her home and was told that the authorities had been looking for her - stayed with her friend’s father – he told her that, as the chief had a representative in 10 provinces, she would be found anywhere she went in Cameroon - travelled to France and then to Ireland – adverse credibility findings – her evidence both in examination and chief and cross examination was not summarised – the court is of the view that in every case, the evidence given in chief- and cross examination should be provided in the course of the outline of the applicant’s claim - no evidence could be found in the Country of Origin Information that the authorities search for girls and women who have escaped from forced marriage – guidelines for the assessment of credibility – tribunal submitted that in the view of the clear and unequivocal findings on credibility, the tribunal member did not have to consider the issue of internal relocation.