Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Plaintiff in personal injuries action did not attempt to mislead the court
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses to dismiss a personal injuries action arising out of a road traffic accident, finding that the plaintiff gave her evidence, so far as accuracy was concerned, to the best of her ability and did not attempt to mislead the court; and the court awards damages in the sum of €32,500, of which €27,500 was attributed to damages for pain and suffering, €7,500 for future pain and suffering and €62,500 for general damages.
Personal injuries action – road traffic accident – assessment of damages – false evidence - application pursuant to s.26 of the Civil Liability and Courts Act 2004 seeking a dismissal of the plaintiff’s action refused – ability to coach team hindered – effected his personal life – Book of Quantum – neck injuries – pain and suffering – future pain and suffering – moderately sever category – awarded damages for personal injuries.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
