High Court directs the surrender of an individual to the Republic of Latvia to serve a two-year prison sentence for fraud, after the suspension of the sentence was lifted due to non-compliance with probationary conditions. The individual's objections, including the specificity of the European Arrest Warrant (EAW), the arrest procedure, potential violation of the non-retroactivity principle, and the legality of the in absentia sentence activation, were all dismissed. The court found that the EAW met the necessary legal requirements and that the individual's rights under the European Convention on Human Rights were not breached.
European Arrest Warrant (EAW), fraud, suspended sentence, probationary supervision, Republic of Latvia, High Court, surrender, non-compliance, in absentia, European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), nullum crimen sine lege (no crime without law), nulla poena sine lege (no penalty without law), Schengen Information System (SIS II alert), Council Framework Decision on the European Arrest Warrant (2002/584/JHA), Sentence Execution Code of Latvia, s. 16(2) of the European Arrest Warrant Act 2003, s. 37 objection, s. 45 objection, s. 11 objection, s. 13 objection.