High Court, in a case stated from District Court where the District judge convicted the defendant of resisting and obstructing a peace officer and of assault, finds that the Gardaí did not enjoy a common law power to enter the dwelling of the defendant to effect an arrest for the offence of breach of the peace, and the District judge was incorrect in holding that the defendant had a case to answer in relation to the obstruction charge.
Case stated – criminal law – appeared in the District Court in respect of two offences - resisting and obstructing a peace officer - assault contrary to s. 2 of the Non-Fatal Offences Against The Person Act, 1997 – facts as found by the District Judge – close of the prosecution application made that the defendant had no case to answer - submitted that the gardaí had no right under common law to enter the defendant’s apartment home to effect an arrest for breach of the peace - constitutional right to the inviolability of his dwelling – District Judge held that the Gardaí had a common law power to enter the defendant’s apartment to effect an arrest for the offence of breach of the peace contrary to common law - convicted the defendant on the obstruction charge – questions stated to the High Court – whether the gardaí enjoy a common law power to enter the dwelling of the defendant to effect an arrest for the offence of breach of the peace, contrary to common law – whether the District Judge correct in holding that the defendant had a case to answer in relation to the obstruction charge - No attempt was made to retrospectively validate the entry on the basis that the gardaí could have lawfully entered the defendant’s dwelling under statutory powers to arrest - relevant statutory provision is s. 6 of the Criminal Law Act, 1997 - would have been impermissible - Save where life is in imminent danger, in which case other constitutional rights are engaged, the restrictions on the rights/guarantees enshrined in Article 40.5 are those set out in statute - Gardaí did not enjoy a common law power to enter the dwelling of the defendant to effect an arrest for the offence of breach of the peace - District Judge incorrect in holding that the defendant had a case to answer in relation to the obstruction charge