Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants application of Irish citizen IVF sperm donor: (a) declaring him the father of a child born in India under a surrogacy agreement; (b) appointing him as guardian of the child; (c) dispensing with the consent of the surrogate mother to the issue of a passport to the child; and (d) allowing the child to remain in the custody of the father and ‘intended mother’ under surrogacy arrangement.
Family law – guardianship - application to appoint father (next friend) as guardian of infant applicant (EP) and to obtain orders enabling passport to be obtained for infant applicant – infant applicant born September 2010 in India – surrogacy arrangement – IVF – father (sperm donor) is next friend (ZP) – anonymous donor egg – ‘intended mother’ is second notice party (PZ): joined as a notice party not by any legal right but by factual interest – ZP and PZ are named as father and mother of infant on birth certificate issued in India in Sept. 2010 – ZP is an Irish citizen and holder of an Irish passport – surrogate mother (TF) is a widow in India – contention that infant applicant is an Irish citizen pursuant to Irish Nationality and Citizenship Act 1956 – Department of Foreign Affairs requires declare of parentage pursuant to s.35 Status of Children Act 1987 before it can issue a passport to the applicant – Attorney General joined to proceedings to ensure that any order made would be binding on all state authorities – TF notified of proceedings and consenting to orders sought – genetic tests - court satisfied that ZP is the father of the applicant – applicant has had her habitual residence with ZP and PZ at all material times – ZP and PZ have at all material times held parental responsibility for applicant within meaning of Brussels II bis Regulations – interests of the applicant are of paramount importance: Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 – court is satisfied that it is in best interests of the child to be cared for and reared by de facto family of ZP and PZ – declaration pursuant to Part VI Status of Children Act 1987 that ZP is the father of the applicant – that ZP be appointed guardian of the applicant under s.6A Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 – that custody of applicant continue as currently with PZ and ZP – that the consent of TF (surrogate mother) be dispensed with for the issuing of a passport to the applicant whilst the applicant is a minor, pursuant to s.14(3) Passports Act 2008 and s.11 Guardianship of Infants Act 1964.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.