High Court dismisses the plaintiff's claim against a bank and a law firm, finding the allegations of fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation in prior possession proceedings to be frivolous, vexatious, and disclosing no reasonable cause of action. The plaintiff's attempt to challenge the finality of previous Circuit Court and High Court decisions was deemed an abuse of process. The plaintiff had argued that the defendants misled the Circuit Court by using a valuation certificate to establish jurisdiction and misrepresented the debt amount and nature of the loan. However, these issues had been raised or could have been raised in the earlier proceedings, and the plaintiff did not appeal the Circuit Court's possession order. The Court held that the plaintiff's case could not succeed and that no amendment to the pleadings could save the claim.
High Court - dismissal - plaintiff - bank - law firm - fraud - deceit - misrepresentation - possession proceedings - valuation certificate - Circuit Court - abuse of process - res judicata - Henderson v Henderson - constitutional rights - European Convention on Human Rights - Consumer Credit Act - Directive 93/13/EEC - Order 19 Rule 28 (RSC) - inherent jurisdiction - appeal - equitable interest - trust property - Irish Republican Brotherhood - pseudo-legalese - McKenzie friend.