High Court determines that it does not have jurisdiction to determine whether a summons to tax, which was served almost twelve years after the final orders in a personal injuries case, should be dismissed on the grounds of delay, on the basis that the proceedings were brought to a conclusion by the making of a final order, and the orders sought are beyond the limited supervisory jurisdiction to review a decision of the Taxing Master retained by the Court after the conclusion of proceedings.
Trial of a preliminary issue - Seeking an order dismissing the summons to tax on the grounds of delay - whether or not the court has jurisdiction to entertain this application at all - road traffic accident – issued proceedings which subsequently settled - order of the court - plaintiff’s solicitors did not deliver a bill of costs to the defendant’s solicitors until almost twelve years later – summons to tax – adjournments – defendants brought this application - delay jurisprudence - neither party raised the issue of the court’s jurisdiction to entertain the application – jurisdiction of the Court - novel jurisdiction for which there is no authority - proceedings were brought to a conclusion by the making of a final order - limited supervisory jurisdiction to review a decision of the Taxing Master - all of the delay jurisprudence is concerned with the progress of litigation to its final conclusion – court determines that it does not have jurisdiction to entertain the defendant’s application – application dismissed