Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court strikes out a case where the plaintiffs sought to question a financial institution's entitlement to possession of a property, despite a previous final determination affirming the institution's right, on the grounds that it is an abuse of process and bound to fail, and the plaintiffs were impermissibly attempting to re-litigate issues already conclusively decided.
High Court - possession order - abuse of process - financial institution - property entitlement - Order 19 Rule 28 (RSC) - inherent jurisdiction - res judicata - strike out - promissory note - irrevocable trust - redemption figure - collateral attack - final order - mortgage discharge - documentary evidence - locus standi - hearsay evidence.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only e-mail alert service for all Irish judgments over the past 13 years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now