High Court quashes the Circuit Court's decision which had vacated an Adjudication Officer's order for compensation to a family denied hotel accommodation. The High Court found the Circuit Court hearing to be unfair due to excessive judicial intervention, necessitating a fresh hearing before a different judge. The original case involved allegations of discrimination against the family, both as recipients of Homeless Assistance Payment and as members of the Traveller community, which the Workplace Relations Commission had upheld.
Judicial review - certiorari - discrimination - Homeless Assistance Payment (HAP) - Traveller community - Equal Status Act 2000 - Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) - Circuit Court - High Court - excessive judicial intervention - fair procedures - natural justice - bias - Adjudication Officer - credit card policy - burden of proof - remedy - appeal.