High Court, in determining costs of an appeal from the Circuit Court, determines that there should be no order in respect of the costs of the appeal, on the grounds that it is in the interests of justice that each party bear its own costs of the appeal.
Circuit Court appeal – costs of legal proceedings - change in the identity of the parties to the proceedings since the appeal was lodged – complications with service – application for legal costs - default position under Section 169 of the Legal Services Regulation Act 2015 is that a party who has been “entirely successful” in proceedings is normally entitled to recover their legal costs against the unsuccessful party – argued that concession on the part of the personal representative came too late - court should consider the date, terms and circumstances of any offer of settlement - striking feature of the offer of settlement in the present case is that it was made at a time when the personal representative was not actually a party to the proceedings - personal representative’s solicitor has never been on record in these proceedings - correspondence relied upon by the appellant had thus been sent to a solicitor who was not on record in the proceedings and related to a client who was not a party to the proceedings - lacked capacity at that time to compromise the proceedings - no order in respect of the costs of the appeal to the High Court - in the interests of justice that each party bear its own costs of the appeal.