Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Income from emergency accommodation services not classified as rental income
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court ruled that income received from providing emergency accommodation and associated services did not constitute rental income under Case V of Schedule D, as the provider retained control and possession of the property and offered services beyond those typical of a landlord-tenant relationship. The original decision by the Tax Appeal Commission, which determined the income was trade-related and chargeable under Case I of Schedule D, was upheld. The court found no error in the Commission's interpretation of the relevant statute or previous High Court decision, affirming that the crucial ingredient for a payment to be considered "rent" is the existence of a landlord-tenant relationship, which was absent in this case.
emergency accommodation, rental income, trade-related income, landlord-tenant relationship, exclusive possession, control of property, ancillary services, Taxes Consolidation Act 1997, Schedule D, Case I, Case V, Tax Appeal Commission, High Court decision, Twomey (Inspector of Taxes) v. Hennessy, landlord and tenant agreement, income tax, possession and occupation, services beyond landlord's activities, Tax Treatment of Income, Business Relief from Capital Acquisitions Tax, Housing Act 1988.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
