High Court, on appeal from the Circuit Court, refuses possession of premises by way of summary judgment, on the grounds that the plaintiff, a financial institution, had not adequately established ownership of both the registered charge and the underlying debt, with the defendants raising concerns about potential transactions affecting the charge's ownership. The court determined that the matter required a full plenary hearing due to the plaintiff's failure to address the defendants' assertions, despite the defendants not fully establishing a defence to the underlying proceedings.
High Court, appeal, Circuit Court, possession order, Registration of Title Act 1964, Personal Insolvency Practitioner, de novo hearing, loan agreement, charge, default, arrears, beneficial interest, bare trustee, securitisation, portfolio sales, legal title, summary relief, plenary hearing, Order 5B of the Circuit Court Rules.