Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal refuses application to extend time within which to bring an appeal where the appellant was convicted of assault, finding that insufficient material had been put before the court to justify extending time; there was evidence that the injuries were not self-inflicted (contrary to the appellant's new argument); and there must be finality in criminal litigation.
Criminal law – application to extend time within which to bring an appeal – assault appeal – insufficient material has been put before the court to justify extending time – there must be finality in criminal litigation – application to extend time refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.