High Court answers questions stated by the District Court as follows: (a) it had not been lawful, prior to the commencement of the relevant Act, to generate, retain and/or enter a DNA profile onto a database in the manner described in the case; (b) nor was it lawful for the DNA profiles generated from the relevant sample to be included on the database after the commencement of the Act; and (c) in light of the High Court's answers to the first two questions, it was for the trial judge to determine if the DNA evidence replied upon by the prosecution was admissible.
Case stated from the District Court - defendant charged with burglary - no measures employed by gardai to preserve the crime scene between evening of burglary and following day - no evidence adduced as to persons who had access to the house - following day swab taken of blood from a bedroom and then stored at garda station until sent for forensic analysis - DNA profile generated - departure from previous policy that DNA profile would only be generated from crime scene sample if suspected offender was nominated - laboratory was creating an 'intermediate database' prior to the entering into force of the Criminal Justice (Forensic Evidence and DNA Database System) Act 2014 - on unestablished date a bodily sample taken from the defendant was entered onto the 'reference index' of the intermediate database - prosecution unable to establish surrounding circumstances for taking of that sample or whether it was taken after commencement of 2014 Act - crime scene sample matched DNA of defendant - second DNA sample taken from defendant in detention - questions stated: (1) whether it was lawful to generate, retain and/or enter a DNA profile onto a database in the manner described before commencement of 2014 Act; (2) whether lawful for DNA profile from the sample to be included on the DNA database after the commencement of 2014 Act; (3) whether evidence of the match between DNA profile from sample prior to commencement of 2014 Act and profile lawfully taken from sample after that enactment admissible; (4) was the District Court entitled to admit the DNA evidence.