International protection decision contained errors of fact and was inadequately reasoned

Judicial review – asylum and immigration – Eswatinian national challenging decision of the International Protection Appeals Tribunal refusing her international protection - claimed a risk of persecution due to her involvement in an opposition movement – claims she was harassed by police for wearing trousers contrary to local expectations of modesty – applied for asylum - made a declaration of voluntary return - withdrew her asylum application - indicated an intention to withdraw the request for voluntary repatriation – Minister consented to the making of a further protection application – application for asylum refused – IPAT came into being – appeal adjourned to allow subsidiary protection application – subsidiary protection application refused – appeals refused – judicial review issued - alleged irrelevance of her motivation for coming to Ireland - lawful for the tribunal to conclude in particular circumstances that a person was motivated by personal factors, so motivation is not at all irrelevant to the task of the tribunal - alleged breach of fair procedures - first arrests for wearing t-shirts – claims that the circumstances of her arrest should have been put to her – no evidential basis for the fair procedures point - alleged error of fact regarding emails - manufactured documents - alleged error of fact regarding t-shirts - complaint regarding an error of fact under this heading is made out because the tribunal did not factor in the material regarding the previous wearing of t-shirts and implied that there was a significance in the proximity between the particular arrests referred to and her story of being given a t-shirt – alleged illogicality of the finding regarding possession of membership cards – country of origin information – lack of adequate reasoning - not possible to sever the problematic parts of the decision from the remainder – judicial review granted.