High Court refuses judicial review of the decision refusing an Albanian national international protection on the grounds that the International Protection Appeals Tribunal did not err in law or act in breach of natural and constitutional justice in making fresh findings without prior notice in the context of a 'papers-only' appeal.
Asylum and immigration – judicial review – Albanian national challenging the decision refusing him international protection – claimed that his nephew was murdered - claims to believe that he too is at risk of being killed by the criminal gang – fled to Ireland – refused international protection – papers only appeal – argued that the Tribunal erred in law and acted in breach of natural and constitutional justice in making fresh findings without prior notice on a papers-only appeal – overlap in the decisions – notice – generic pleadings – Court does not accept that the IPAT erred in law and/or acted in breach of natural and constitutional justice in making fresh findings without prior notice in the context of a papers-only appeal – argued that Tribunal acted ultra vires in accepting, considering and determining the appeal of the decision of the IPO in circumstances where a lawful examination of his application for international protection was not carried out by an authorised person of the IPO – Court previously rejected this argument – decision from Supreme Court awaited – judicial review refused