Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
IPAT’s credibility findings and assessment of country of origin information were lawful
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses judicial review of a decision refusing Nigerian national international protection, on the grounds that the International Protection Appeals Tribunal’s credibility findings and assessment of country of origin information were lawful.
Asylum and immigration – judicial review – Nigerian national challenging decision refusing her international protection – feared violence allegedly suffered (or to be suffered) at the hands or instigation of her husband’s family - chronological summary of events - failed to provide reasons that were cogent and related to the substantive basis of the claim - failed to consider particular Country of Origin Information – credibility - nature of an appeal - adverse credibility findings - all relevant facts and circumstances relating to her appeal were considered – judicial review refused –
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
