Court of Appeal allows appeal of High Court order concerning whether there was jurisdiction to allow the removal of a child from this jurisdiction to the USA, on the grounds that: a) a value embodied in the Brussels II bis Regulation and enshrined in the Constitution is that a minor habitually resident in this State is entitled to have issues concerning welfare and best interests determined in the Irish courts notwithstanding the doctrine of forum non conveniens; b) the courts of Ireland, the State of the minor’s habitual residence, have full and primary jurisdiction to make determinations, after such inquiries as are deemed fit, with regard to all aspects of best interests and welfare; and c) the Irish High Court has jurisdiction to deal with the case.
Family law – appeal of High Court order that there was no jurisdiction to prohibit the removal of a child from this jurisdiction – application for order recognising and enforcing orders of the Kent County Family Court, Rhode Island, United States of America – return of child to Rhode Island from Ireland – injunction prohibiting the removal of child from this jurisdiction – O. 25, r. 2 RSC – O. 34, r. 2 RSC – whether the Courts of Ireland have exclusive jurisdiction – whether the High Court had any jurisdiction, in relation to all issues of parental responsibility concerning the minor – Child Abduction and Enforcement of Custody Orders Act 1991 – Article 8 of Council Regulation EC 2001/2003 – Part II of the Guardianship of Infants Act 1964 – O. 70A of the Rules of the Superior Courts – s. 45 of the Children and Family Relationships Act 2015 – Art. 42A.4 of the Constitution – judicial comity – Hague Convention on International Child Abduction 1980 – European Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions Concerning Custody of Children and on Restoration of Custody of Children – Council Regulation EC No. 2201/2003 – Dicey, Morris & Collins “The Conflict of Laws” 15th Edition – Brussels II bis – S.I. No. 112/2005 – European Communities (Judgments in Matrimonial Matters and Matters of Parental Responsibility) Regulations, 2005 – habitual residence – does BII bis apply where orders have been made in a non-member state concerning a child habitually resident in Ireland – Thomas Rauscher, “Parental Responsibility Cases under the new Council Regulation ‘Brussels IIA’”, The European Legal Forum, 1–2005, 37, 40 – forum non conveniens – value embodied in the Brussels II bis Regulation and enshrined in the Constitution is that a minor habitually resident in this state is entitled to have issues concerning welfare and best interests determined in the Irish courts – Children and Family Relationships Act 2015 (Commencement of Certain Provisions) Order 2016 – estoppel – doctrine of estoppel is not engaged – s15 of the Courts Act 1981 – whether the District and Circuit Courts have exclusive jurisdiction to hear and determine the substantive application – jurisdiction of Irish Courts – appeal allowed.