Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court allows appeal from an order of the Master of the High Court striking out summary judgment proceedings, and refers them to a plenary hearing, on the grounds that there are issues to be tried in light of the failure to establish on the balance of probabilities that there has been a default of the loan; the difficulty presenting as regards whether demand was duly made; and the issue as to whether the loan is a limited recourse loan or not.
Summary judgment – appeal from an order of the Master of the High Court striking out proceedings – Order 37 of the Rules of the Superior Courts 1986 – Master has no jurisdiction in contested cases other than to transfer them for determination by a judge – whether there has been any default under the loan arrangement pursuant to which default has allegedly been made – whether the loan is a limited recourse loan – applicable legal principles – matter referred to plenary hearing.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.