Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Court of Appeal refuses to recognise a judgment from the Warsaw Court of Appeal against an individual, on the grounds that the recognition of such a judgment would be manifestly contrary to Irish public policy, on the grounds that the judgment in question arose from an assignment of claims to a company, which was impermissible due to the prohibition on maintenance and champerty, and a fundamental principle of the legal order in Ireland is the prohibition of the commodification of litigation.
Public policy - champerty - maintenance - assignment of claims - recognition and enforcement of judgments - Brussels I (Recast) - Warsaw Court of Appeal - Irish Court of Appeal - judicial independence - fundamental principles - legal order - commodification of litigation - refusal of recognition - SPV Osus Ltd - McCool v. Honeywell Control Systems - prohibition on assignment - essential rule of law.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.