Judicial review applicant to bear costs after unsuccessful challenge to transfer under Dublin III regulation

High Court rules that the applicant must bear the costs of the judicial review proceedings after their challenge against a transfer to France under the Dublin III Regulation was unsuccessful. The court found that the State Respondents were entirely successful in their defense, and there was no basis to depart from the general rule that costs follow the event. The applicant's arguments, including the alleged failure to exchange health data and the authority of the official to make the transfer decision, did not meet the threshold of special and general public importance to warrant an exception to the rule on costs.