Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court awards costs to the applicants in a judicial review application after the Minister for Justice revoked a deportation order against the first applicant, an infant, rendering the proceedings moot, on the grounds that: it reasonable for the applicants to have commenced proceedings given the significant legal consequences of the deportation order and the lack of assurance provided to the applicants regarding the infant's right to remain with his mother, who had been granted permission to stay in the State; the original decision to issue a deportation order was set aside due to the revocation; and the applicants were entitled to their costs, including the costs of making the costs application.
Judicial review - costs application - deportation order - revocation - Minister for Justice - permission to remain - dependent child - Stamp 4 - Immigration Act 1999, s. 3(11) - International Protection Act 2015, s. 49, s. 51 - family and private life rights - EU law -Constitution - certiorari - mandamus - mootness - reasonable to commence proceedings.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.