Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Judicial review application denied due to procedural deficiencies and excessive delay
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses an application for judicial review sought by a self-represented litigant challenging the rejection of his notices of appeal by the Courts Service of Ireland, on the grounds that the proceedings were initiated out of time; that the substantive legal arguments presented by the litigant were incorrect; and that the litigant failed to engage constructively with the Courts Service to rectify the identified deficiencies in his appeal notices.
Judicial review - mandamus - Data Protection Act, 1988 - Courts Service of Ireland - Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC) - Courts of Justice Act, 1936 - notice of appeal - procedural deficiencies - delay - extension of time - administrative functions - High Court - Circuit Court - appeal on point of law.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
