Judicial review cannot provide answer to complaint raised in respect of psychiatric detention

Judicial review - certiorari - application to quash renewal order authorising continued involuntary detention under mental health legislation - declaration of unconstitutionality - intellectual disorder - serious psychotic episode in 2015 - lack of full-time state support in community - whether detention order made solely on basis of a lack of suitable residential placement available to applicant - proposed alternative accommodation unavailable at present - dangers of early discharge to applicant's condition - likely to be non-compliant with required medication treatment if discharged - pleadings - alleged preventative detention - right to private life - whether decision to discontinue planned transfer was arbitrary and irrational - independent psychiatric report - statement of opposition - non-exhaustion of appeal mechanism - effectiveness of appeal to Circuit Court - tribunal cannot reconvene to consider legality of its own decision - mental health legislation - definition of 'mental disorder' - discharge - parties submissions - constitutional right to liberty - ECHR - availability of review procedures - no argument that detention procedures operate unfairly - inherent contradiction in level of care required - whether applicant has locus standi to challenge detention on basis of a lack of review procedures where he doesn't deny he suffers from a mental disorder - applicant cannot say his interests are adversely affected by the operation of the statute - no standing - methods of review of detention open to applicant - best interests of person principle - habeas corpus and judicial review proceedings unlikely to consider whether applicant suffering from mental disorder - mechanisms inappropriate for review of detention - no review available within 12 months of renewal order being made - incompatible with Article 5 ECHR.