High Court orders that judicial review proceedings concerning the admissibility of screenshots in a disciplinary process is to be heard in camera, on the grounds, inter alia, that the relatively few inquiries before the respondent, coupled with the question of the admissibility of the particular evidence, increased the risk of identification of the applicant and other parties.
judicial review - challenge decision to admit screenshot evidence - oral hearing proceeded in public with full anonymity in relation to a) any publication relating to the inquiry in respect of the applicant b) all witnesses who would be called to give evidence c)any person referred to in the inquiry d) the institution involved and e) any person place or thing or matter which may identify or enable identification of the aforesaid - Gilchrist & Rogers v Sunday Newspapers Ltd - Article 34.1 of the Constitution - strict construction and sceptical perspective to the claim of exceptionality to the principle of trial in public - Court of the view that the facts and circumstances of this case in the context of the net issue concerning the question of admissibility of the contested evidence are exceptional and pressing - order directing that the hearing of this application for judicial review proceed in camera