Judicial review of sexual abuse investigation was premature

Judicial review – appeal of High Court orders refusing to quash CFA investigation and restraining the publication of material tending to identify non-professional parties to the proceedings – s. 45 of the Courts (Supplemental Provisions) Act 1961 – complaint of sexual abuse in a non-contact manner by father – whether cross examination should be afforded to the father at the investigation stage – whether the application for judicial review is premature – whether the right to fair procedures of a respondent to a Child and Family Agency child sexual abuse investigation includes the right to cross examination, through counsel, a complainant of full age and capacity who is available but unwilling to attend for that purpose – Child and Family Agency Act 2013 – has the process herein gone irremediably wrong – application for judicial review must fail because it has been made prematurely – appeal allowed.