The High Court granted a decree of judicial separation to both parties in a long-standing marital dispute involving a family farm, a family home, and dependent children. The applicant was awarded a lump sum of €650,000 plus 60% of the net value of undisclosed inherited lands, primarily to enable her to obtain suitable accommodation and cover legal costs. The court found the applicant entitled to substantial provision given her contributions throughout a lengthy marriage, despite the respondent’s pre-marital ownership and strong family provenance of key assets. The judgment also addressed litigation misconduct due to the respondent’s non-disclosure of newly inherited lands and failures of candour during proceedings, which resulted in further costs orders against him. Maintenance arrangements were made for the dependent children, and the respondent retained the core farming assets necessary for his livelihood. The court’s decision turned on balancing the needs, contributions, asset provenance, earning capacities, and issues of disclosure, providing for the applicant’s future independence while preserving the farming enterprise for the respondent.
judicial separation – family law – ancillary relief – lump sum award – maintenance for children – division of family assets – non-disclosure of assets – litigation misconduct – inherited farm – proper provision – family home – High Court – marital breakdown – asset provenance – section 16 of Family Law Act 1995 – Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC) – custody and access