High Court refuses a homeless man leave to amend his statement of grounds to include an additional relief in his judicial review challenging the housing decisions of Dublin City Council, on the grounds that he failed to establish a good and sufficient reason for extending the period within which the application for judicial review had to be made.
Judicial review – homeless man challenging decision of the council that he should be considered for one-bedroomed accommodation - homeless man wants to amend his proceedings to challenge the decision of the council refusing his application for a particular housing unit – separated father of two children - could have overnight access to his children if he had suitable accommodation- constitution - equality legislation – council found that he is listed as a single applicant and therefore is “not eligible to be considered for a two-bedroom vacancy” – duty to give reasons – argued that the reasons for the decision are not set out – application to amend statement of grounds - order for leave – caselaw governing applications for leave to add further reliefs and grounds to application for judicial review - good and sufficient reason for granting the extension of time - upon a change of counsel sought to add additional reliefs and grounds, not because the previous counsel had erred but rather, because “it is inevitable that different counsel will take a different view of the same case – principles governing the application – explain the delay – grant of amendment would cause delay to the council - has been aware at all relevant times of the facts relevant to the new ground - advancing an entirely new cause of action - application refused.