Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses application for leave to apply for judicial review of decision by International Protection Appeals Tribunal to refuse the applicant, a failed asylum seeker, subsidiary protection, on the grounds that the applicant, at his appeal, failed to present sufficient grounds for his claim that he would be subjected to a 'real risk' of harm if he were to be returned to his home country of Algeria, and the Tribunal itself did adequately consider such 'country of origin' information in making its decision against the applicant's interests.
Judicial review - application for leave - decision of ineligibility for subsidiary protection - concept of 'real risk' - whether a failure to have regard to prevalence of prosecutions of persons in Algeria for the offence of irregular exit - country of origin information - whether such information was ignored - 'real risk rather than a 'mere possibility' - insufficient evidence provided at appeal - onus of proof undischarged - application for leave refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.