Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses leave to seek judicial review of a planning consent issued in 2022 concerning the construction of concrete storage bays and reclaimer unit, where the applicant had previously withdrawn their application and failed to exhaust all remedies by not submitting a valid appeal to the planning board. The applicant's attempt to reinstate the withdrawn application was deemed inappropriate due to the absence of exceptional circumstances and the significant prejudice it would cause to the notice party. The court emphasized the importance of adhering to procedural rules and time limits, particularly in the context of planning decisions.
Judicial Review, Planning Decision, Withdrawal of Proceedings, Failure to Exhaust Remedies, Invalid Appeal, Reinstatement of Proceedings, Exceptional Circumstances, Prejudice to Third Parties, High Court, Planning Board, Time Limits, Procedural Rules, Leave to Appeal.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.