Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court: (a) makes order for discovery in an action for infringement of a patent for arthritis treatment concerning the decision to use the product for the treatment of chronic lymphocitic leukemia; (b) makes order for discovery as agreed by the plaintiffs concerning a pharmaceutical study; but (c) refuses other discovery sought including 'inventors' notebooks' where the discovery would be burdensome and was sought for a length of time between 14 and 22 years.
Intellectual property - patent - action for infringement - treatment of arthritis - marketing authorisation granted to product - whether new product infringes previous patent - application for discovery - documents concerning conception and development of product - documents concerning decision to use product to treat lyphocytic leukemia - lengthy period of discovery sought (14-22 years) - relevance, necessity and proportionality - corresponding litigation in United Kingdom - "inventor's notebooks" - whether assembly of documentation was burdensome - compromised proceedings - difference between discovery sought in Irish proceedings and in UK proceedings.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.