Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Litigant barred from initiating new proceedings against judges and legal professionals without court approval
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
The High Court granted an Isaac Wunder Order, restraining a litigant from issuing new proceedings against a specified list of individuals and entities, including judges, legal professionals, and court officials, without prior leave from the President of the High Court or a designated judge. This decision follows a pattern of frivolous and vexatious litigation by the plaintiff, including unfounded allegations and repeated attempts to relitigate settled matters, which have abused court processes and wasted resources. The order aims to serve as a screening mechanism to prevent further misuse of the legal system while not impeding legitimate claims.
Isaac Wunder Order, frivolous litigation, vexatious litigant, abuse of court process, legal system protection, screening mechanism, judges, legal professionals, court officials, High Court of Ireland, constitutional right of access to court, bona fide claims, res judicata, collateral attack, unrecoverable costs, recusal applications, inherent jurisdiction, public interest, European Union law, Charter of Fundamental Rights.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
