Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants an application to substitute a financial entity as the plaintiff in an ongoing appeal regarding an order for possession of a property. The decision was based on the transfer of loan and security interests from the original plaintiff to the applicant. The court found it in the interests of justice to allow the substitution, emphasising that the order does not resolve substantive issues which may arise during the appeal or at the enforcement stage. The court also refused the defendant's request to refer questions of law to the Court of Justice of the European Union, finding no European law issues requiring determination in this application.
High Court, substitution of plaintiff, property possession appeal, loan transfer, security interest, Order 17 rule 4 RSC, transmission of interest, financial entity, enforcement stage, European law, Court of Justice of the European Union, data protection, consumer protection, informed consent, transparency, accountability, "right to be forgotten", "right to informational self-determination".
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only fast reporting service for all Irish judgments over the past ten years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now