Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court grants the applicant's request to be substituted as the plaintiff in ongoing enforcement proceedings, affirming the transfer of a loan and the right to execute a judgment originally obtained by the plaintiff against the defendant, the court rejecting the defendant's arguments, including the claim that the loan had been extinguished by a previous settlement agreement and that the judgment had not been effectively transferred due to the absence of explicit mention in the deed of transfer.
Substitution of plaintiff - loan transfer - execution of judgment - settlement agreement - deed of transfer - redaction - commercial sensitivity - client confidentiality - Rules of the Superior Courts (RSC) - O.17, r.4, O.42, r.24 - merger doctrine - assignment of chose in action - Supreme Court of Judicature Act (Ireland) 1877 - consent of debtor - hearsay evidence - legal interpretation - stamp duty - bona fide doubt - fishing expedition.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.