Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court, in a dispute over whether a lane constitutes a roadway and is thus part of the public road: (a) refuses to grant the plaintiff a declaration that the area in dispute is a public right of way, on the grounds that the court is not satisfied that the plaintiff has proven as a matter of probability based on sufficiently cogent evidence that there was established, between 1991 and 2012 or 2016 or from before 1991, a public right of way over the area in dispute or its dedication as such by the property owners who were still exercising their rights over it; (b) grants the defendant a declaration that he is the legal owner of the area; and (c) refuses the defendant's counterclaim for damages arising from alleged slander.
Notice to Treat from compulsory purchase order dated February 20th 2012 – dispute over whether lane constitutes a roadway and thus part of the public road – plaintiff claims there is as there is a declaration on the Notice stating it is so and seeks court order validating same – defendant claims such a categorisation is outside the scope of the Roads Act 1993 - defendant counterclaims for slander on the part of the plaintiff in declaring the lands to be public and for a declaration stating him to be the legal owner of Corban’s Lane – planning permission had been granted in 1974 – defendant and predecessor-in-title had asserted rights over property – plaintiff did not provide that a public right of way had been established at any time – acquiescence to flow of traffic onto their land not a dedication, implied or otherwise, of the land for public use or as a public right of way -plaintiff took no steps to make a declaration under Roads Act 1993 in respect of Corban’s Lane – plaintiff’s application refused – defendant legal owner of the private property and such declaration made – no grounds for counterclaim for slander, dismissed.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel.
Click here to request a subscription.