Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
High Court refuses judicial review of decision refusing a Ghanaian national subsidiary protection and ordering his deportation, on the grounds that mainstream country of origin information does not need to be put to an applicant, and the obligation on the Minister for Justice to consider up to date country of origin material means there is no illegality in considering material generated after the date of the application.
Judicial review – asylum and immigration – substantive decision – Ghanaian national challenging decision of the Minister for Justice refusing him subsidiary protection and ordering his deportation – refused asylum, subsidiary protection and deportation order made – amendment application - legalistic grounds already rejected - allegation that the Minister relied on material that post-dated the application without notice to the Ghanaian national - mainstream country information does not need to be put to an applicant - the obligation on the Minister to consider up to date country material means there is no illegality in considering material generated after the date of the application – judicial review refused.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now