Court of Appeal dismisses appeal of prison sentence of two years and six months, entirely suspended, for terrorising two women with a low velocity weapon which fired pellets on the grounds of undue leniency, finding that while the sentence was extremely lenient, the court is reluctant to deem the sentence unduly lenient, particularly in circumstances where there has been a delay in seeking a review of the sentence, during which time the appellant has enjoyed his freedom and has taken advantage of the chance given to him.
Criminal law – sentencing – undue leniency – whether prison terms of two years and six months entirely suspended were unduly lenient – two counts of having an article in an public place with intention to intimidate another – s. 9(5) of the Firearms and Offensive Weapons Act 1990 – s. 2 of the Criminal Justice Act 1993 – respondent intimidated two women with low velocity weapon which fired pellets – whether the sentence adequately reflected the gravity of the offending – Court is reluctant to deem the sentence unduly lenient, and particularly so in circumstances where there has been a delay in seeking a review of the sentence during which time the appellant has enjoyed his freedom and has taken advantage of the chance given to him – appeal dismissed.