Trusted by the judiciary, government lawyers, prosecutors, and many leading counsel. Click here to request a subscription.
|
or click here to request site subscription to search and view all judgments |
Supreme Court allows appeal from Court of Appeal, and determines that a company's interest in litigation might in principle be assigned to a natural person to pursue the action, irrespective of whether the purpose of the assignment was to avoid the rule that a company be represented by a lawyer rather than a director or shareholder.
Woulfe J (majority judgment): Appeal from Court of Appeal - provider of heating and airconditioning systems - claim against English manufacturer and distributer - 1998 exclusive distribution agreement - tender by English company for project in Ireland - alleged breach of exclusive agreement - whether project covered by agreement - 2005 action - assignment of claim by company to natural person - previously managing director and majority shareholder of company - whether assignment of action was invalid and an abuse of process - attempt by director or shareholder to represent company - attempt to circumvent rule that company be represetned by lawyer - admission to Supreme Court as matter of general public importance - whether public policy precluded the assignment of a cause of action - whether assignment valid - s. 28(6) of the Supreme Court of judicature Act (Ireland), 1877 - assignment to be absolute - debtor to be given notice in writing of assignment - champerty - maintenance.
Concurring judgments by Hogan J and Muray J.
Dissenting judgment by Charleton J.
Note: This is intended to be a fair and accurate report of a decision made public by a court of law. Any errors should be notified to the editor and will be dealt with accordingly.
The only subject matter index for all Irish judgments over the past thirteen years. Click here to request a subscription.
Register Now